Okay, time for a recipe:
1: Get obtain equal amounts of stubborn
evolutionists and stubborn Christian in the same room.
2: Close all exits, barricade them with
heavy objects
3: Bake for 30 minutes
4: Open the doors. If you don't see
either party dead as a result of the other, then the result will be a
creationist debate leading up to said homicide.
I’ve recently been privy to such a
debate, which didn't end the same way as the above recipe would
indicate. The way these debates go, both parties use natural places,
events, and animals to disprove each other. Whether it's a rock
formation which tells of rapid re-polarization of the magnetic field,
or a meticulous evolutionary ancestry diagram, or some beetle or
giraffe which can't possibly have evolved from something prior (due
to several subsystems inside said animals which would be useless
unless they mutated simultaneously, which is very, very unrealistic),
these two parties will inevitably meet up several times a year, trade
falsehoods about each other, then leave in a huff.
To the Evolutionist: please stop. I
believe your idea is more sane, as my God is a sensible and logical
God, and the theory of evolution has been proven a few times in human
history (Google: Samurai Crab). This is not to say I believe in it
all the way, as there ARE holes in most ancestries that cannot
presently be filled. There are, however enough complete section of
the ancestries that I can accept the theory.
To the Creationist: I had a Creationist
as my Biology teacher, and in his single-minded attempts to sell
Creationism to my class, he almost forgot to teach the curriculum. He
had several Creationist posters in his room, and one pertained to
geology's proving Creationism. There's on rock formation near a
volcano , which twists. I forgot what that means, but somehow that
points to a very young earth. Point is, I don't enjoy when someone
takes one small section of the Earth that has some small exceptions,
packages it, and displays it as if it speaks for the entire world. If
you've got evidence, I’d prefer evidence that speaks for the entire
world. I do enjoy looking at the specimens which seem to reject an
ancestor, though.
For both sides, I say this: Drop it. To
the Evolutionist, I couldn't care less. It's a fun theory, and opens
doors to interesting ideas. To the Creationist, I’d suggest you
read a little more into the world God gave us.
I believe that either theory misses the
point entirely. In the Bible's story of creation, I believe the
things that are being created aren't important. It's that God
created. Every day in the “seven” consisted of something that was
started by God, made by God, and deemed worthy by God. It focused on
the Creator, not the creation. If we bog ourselves down
hyper-focusing on how we got
here, we miss the point of why
we are here.
Instead
of Creationism or Evolutionism, I propose Creation. The fact that it
happened.